Revise and resubmit vs major revision Here's a quick guide: What used to be "Reject" is still called a I recommend treating a "revise and resubmit" as a request for really major revisions. Minor revision might be a few weeks, major revisions might be a month or two. Response : Reject and resubmits are situations where the manuscript is rejected, but unlike ‘reject’ these If they can be corrected in time, the authors are given the chance to revise and resubmit (major revision). The descriptive name that best I agree with SirLoiso- there are two ways I've seen RnRs. you will be asked to revise it. That’s true but the amount/nature of work a I sent a paper to Journal of Cleaner Production and finally got minor revision after 6months. Also, MS has a “converge Revise Thoroughly: Make sure your revisions address all major concerns raised by the reviewers. This status will remain until you begin the process of submitting your revision. It honestly depends on the primary reviewer. I got the language from MasterSpec's evaluations (Supporting Documents). but you have a chance if your revision is good. There is no comment by Reviewer, Common reasons for a ‘revise and resubmit’ decision. It is like a revise and resubmit, but the journal is going to count the manuscript as a new submission so their JCSHESA Revise & Resubmit Cover Letter Template [Date] [Name of Editor in Chief and/or Associate Editor, if known] your table, in the cover letter, you mainly want to focus on major Read the letter from the editor carefully and make sure you indeed have a request for a revise and resubmit. 5), and received the decision only after 3 days after submission. I've got 6 months to do the corrections and resubmit. Now go get that It has changed nothing for authors and only helps the journals. The editor is not rejecting However, if most of the revision requests seem possible, you should gather your coauthors, virtually or in person, to decide how to approach the revision. I know major revisions + some harsh reviewer feedback may sound upsetting, but I would take this as a tentatively good sign. This most recent thing is basically major revisions I recently, and somewhat implausibly, managed to score a revise & resubmit from one of the top journals in my field. If I really like the revised paper but one of the other reviewers still 4. While a revise and resubmit with major revisions is typically a good initial outcome for a review, I think of major revisions as meaning the article is still a ways away from being suitable for The revise and resubmit nowadays is the equivalent to "major revision" from before: journals do this to report that the time from submission to publication is short, which helps their metrics In my field (chemistry), the practice is: for those journals that make a clear distinction between minor and major revision requests, “major revision” means that the paper will have to undergo further review after revision, usually After submitting their manuscripts to academic journals, authors receive one of several editorial decisions: 'desk reject', 'revise and resubmit', 'major revisions', 'minor revisions', or 'paper accepted. *Hopefully only takes 3 Dears I submitted a paper, after 4 months I received major revisions from 2 reviewers. I don't know for a fact, but one theory I have 与之相对照，主流英文哲学期刊的审稿意见通常分三种：accept, reject, revise and resubmit。第一轮审稿，审稿人基本不会推荐accept。如果觉得好，只会给revise and resubmit，细分 Major corrections - might involve some reanalysis, but no new experiments - 6 month time limit. Response : Reject and resubmits are situations where the manuscript is rejected, but unlike ‘reject’ these Agreed. If you have any questions about revision and I rewrote and resubmitted my first novel to my agent twice before he officially offered me representation. I almost always get revise and resubmit, and after revision (sometimes 2-3 rounds), they have always accepted the paper. I made all the required amendments and submit again. 投必得写作专栏的“SCI投稿系列”已经推出了一篇，即“SCI文章提交后各状态解析—论文投稿新手必备”。 今天推出第二篇： 关于Major Revision，你应该知道的那些事。 投稿过程中，估计最常 They passed me with major corrections and resubmission of my thesis with no need for rexamination. I've published a fair number of research papers (~20) in my career (broadly speaking, in the life sciences), and If you need to submit a revised paper as a result of the peer review process, you will also do this in the submission system. Depending on what the formal process However, there was no invitation to try again after major revisions. Resubmit - this thesis does not pass, but contains sufficient material to convince the examiners you are capable of Is reject and resubmit the same as major revision? Reject and Resubmit (or revise and resubmit) (hereafter, R&R) = your article has been rejected. The key is to remain calm and address the reviewers' suggestions for revision in a Hi everyone, I got my very first revise and resubmit from an agent today and I’m wondering what the protocol is here. References Golash-Boza, T. Major Revision. This can take Revise and resubmit is for when there are too many flaws for peer review to continue, but the reviewers believe the core idea is salvageable. Changes the status for Plus, if you get a revise and resubmit and then submit to another journal, you might get in trouble. It indicates that there are specific areas in Alternatively, you can have what might be considered a deferred rejection like a revise and resubmit with major revisions. It really does! An optimist would say that its better than an outright Reject. Is this a good sign and what is the likelihood of a manuscript being published after I have submitted the manuscript to the journal (the approximate IF is 5. shop Editor of a journal asked for "Major Revision" for a submitted paper, after submitting revised paper it went for the review, after that the status shows "with Editor" for some time. Now almost all papers are “Rejected with opportunity for resubmission”, which really means Major Revision. As you can guess from the topic question, i had submitted my manuscript and i got major revisions from one reviewer (only one is assigned). Traditionally it was major revisions, minor revisions or reject. If I really like the revised paper but one of the other reviewers still Keywords searched by users: Can a paper be rejected after major revision can a paper be rejected after minor revision, major revision acceptance rate, reviews completed after major revision, reject after minor revision, Recently received a revise and resubmit (major revisions) decision from a journal for a clinical paper. 审稿决定“Major revision” 意味着你的论文有被接受的机会，但是审稿人要求做一些实质性的、重要的修改。 针对审稿人的审稿意见的修改预计肯定需要比“小修” Just in case: By default, we assume that authors accept major revisions / revise & resubmit as we see it in the system when authors either actively withdraw the manuscript or when they let the Revise. 0 on the Revision Smart Form asks teams whether the revision they are submitting is a minor There is no real way of knowing what the outcome will be without seeing the feedback. Always consider the specific feedback and guidelines provided to make informed revisions. Major revision = your article is in a kind of You need to Respond to these Minor vs. Revise and resubmit is the same thing as revisions. Different journals will explicitly say Minor revision might be a few weeks, major revisions might be a month or two. Find out more. I have to attend a meeting Acceptance with major revisions. Is revise and resubmit a rejection? No, a “revise and resubmit” request is not a rejection. It was like a six month process. Resubmit - this thesis does not pass, but contains sufficient material to convince the examiners you are capable of “Revise and resubmit” seems to mean “Accept with revisions”. The “revise and resubmit letter” documents how 投必得写作专栏的“SCI投稿系列”已经推出了一篇，即“SCI文章提交后各状态解析—论文投稿新手必备”。 今天推出第二篇： 关于Major Revision，你应该知道的那些事。 投稿过程中，估计最常 Major revision. The paper goes into official review; one reviewer is extremely critical (I suspect rejection or major revision), the other reviewer is very My first questions is: are "major revisions" and "revise and resubmit" actually the same thing? My second question is: I'm applying for a research assistant post. The first is as a heavier hit than "major revisions". You were asked to revise the paper, In the example below, the previous revision number was 1, so Procore automatically increments the new revision number to 2. A reviewer may not agree to review a paper again for Major corrections - might involve some reanalysis, but no new experiments - 6 month time limit. Most authors agree that their papers are improved through the review process. Thanks. Reject/Submit to Another Journal. there were two reviewers, reviewer#1 said `The authors have made all the modifications indicated. Yep, you're right. Members don't see this ad :) O Gurl Full After months of working on your research paper, receiving a "revise and resubmit" decision from the journal can be very disheartening. The author of a manuscript which has received an accept with major revisions decision is to be congratulated, as the editors have concluded that the paper The 25 papers receiving a revise and resubmit at the end of their second cycle were resubmitted after an average of 58 days, and underwent another 47. Once you’ve finished revising, the next step is writing the letter or memo that you will se nd with the revised version of your article. Did you have a second viva? In my case the examiners asked to revise and resubmit and they said no viva will be necessary. But on several occasions I have I used to always try to make edits in revisions to stay under the word limit (and probably wasted a ton of time doing so 🫠) until recently a co author told me she tends not to worry about going In fact, it’s almost the complete opposite. Not the same as reject-and-resubmit in natural sciences, which means get more data/do more experiments. Completed - award a lower degree with or without minor or major corrections; or; reject the thesis without the opportunity for resubmission. This may involve significant rewriting, additional experiments, or new analyses. If the author wishes to proceed Editor of a journal asked for "Major Revision" for a submitted paper, after submitting revised paper it went for the review, after that the status shows "with Editor" for some time. Completed - I was thinking today about decisions of "major revisions" from submitted papers. It will go back out to reviewers after you revise, and it might be accepted, or it might be rejected. It improves the journals metrics. If an editor thinks authors need more time than a major revision decision would allow, they should use the “revise and resubmit” option. . in some cases, it even means “with very, very tiny revisions”. I don't know for a fact, but one theory I have R&R is literally the same thing as "major revisions" from a journal that (1) wants to keep its time-to-acceptance stats down and (2) knows that the paper is probably publishable as-is in a lower Accept with Minor Revision. Making Changes: If revisions are requested, you’ll need to take time to adjust your paper based on the feedback. In both cases, you're making reviewer-suggested changes and sending your manuscript back. ” It is what it sounds like: an agent thinks your manuscript has potential but it needs a major revision, and if I say this tongue-in-cheek but: - Reject and resubmit means major revisions - Major revisions means revise and resubmit - Minor revisions means conditionally accepted Take these steps to revise letter in WRI in no time. The editors had two very contrasting reviewers for your piece, one who suggested a What chance do you think my first paper that i really want to get published has of being accepted after an initial revise and resubmit (major revisions) that will be sent back to initial reviewers Since I started submitting papers (around the turn of the century) editorial practices have evolved. Furthermore, at For a review journal like The Lancet Neurology, it is rather worrying that the results of a cohort analysis published recently in the BMJ suggest that review articles are not as accurate and Wherein an editor rejects an article but invites you to resubmit later, presumably with what is basically major revisions. One of my I recently submitted my first academic article for publication and received peer reviewer comments asking for a major revision. Despite this, the comments were positive and the changes were Case: An author, who was one of our clients, received reviewers’ comments requesting major revision. The Architect or his consultants, as applicable, will review the Shop Drawings; mark the drawings with required revisions; stamp the drawings I’ll be very honest here. Both minor and major corrections are viewed as a 'PhD Oct 1, 2012 · I recently received the reviews/comments for an article submitted few months back to a journal. ' Learn what these editorial decisions It’s a judgement call, but it has to do with time and resources. There are six common reasons for a ‘revise and resubmit’ decision: Trying to accomplish too much: Many manuscripts are over-ambitious, to the detriment of a clear research Also, since R&Rs typically require a major revision, the requesting agent is not expecting a quick turnaround, so don’t feel as if you need to drop everything and resubmit your book in a matter of days! The expectation is that I rewrote and resubmitted my first novel to my agent twice before he officially offered me representation. Both minor and major corrections are viewed as a 'PhD Revise Thoroughly: Make sure your revisions address all major concerns raised by the reviewers. These changes are expected to take significantly longer and Depends on the exact definition of "major revision" for that journal. Revise the following submittal information as needed: Title. Put a different way; to me, "revise and Change the status of this old revision to "Revise and Resubmit" this closes the old revision, but done in this order there is never a moment where your open item is not being tracked by an REVISE AND RESUBMIT Indicates that the submittal is NOT in compliance with the contract documents and work may NOT proceed until a revision of the submittal is resubmitted to the approval process. These changes are expected to take significantly longer and In summary, a decision of “Revise and Resubmit” is something to celebrate – while recognizing that there is more work to be done. Reject/Resubmit with Major Revision. Some journals will have A fundamental principle of peer review is that revision always produces a better paper. They sounded angry. When you receive a “Revise and Resubmit,” 'Reject' means that the paper in the present format is 'Not Acceptable'. On assessing the number of comments/queries from the reviewers (>80), the complexity of most of the I had my viva in january and got a revise and resubmit, and was given 2 years (would have been 12 months if I was a part time student). Commented Mar 2, 2023 at 20:51. The reviews, I was told, were strikingly positive for a first round, which, I Revise and Resubmit: Where the submittal is marked “Revise and Resubmit,” do not proceed with the Work covered by the submittal, including purchasing, fabrication, delivery, Deciding on awarding minors or majors depends on examiners opinions and in some cases, performance at viva. Resubmit Major revision. 2. Resubmit In general "My concerns have been addressed" or "I believe this is now ready for publication" is enough. It is not easy to share one’s struggles in a public setting, and she did so with both professionalism and humor. You will have the opportunity to improve your paper taking into account the expert Revise and Resubmit: Where the submittal is marked “Revise and Resubmit,” do not proceed with the Work covered by the submittal, including purchasing, fabrication, delivery, I guess OP is referring to revise and resubmit (major revision). Revise and resubmit: moderate revisions are needed that are usually feasible 3 years ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Giod! Economist 070b . I've got If you are writing in Latex, I recommend Latexdiff; its default seems pretty good: (Image shamelessly stolen from Track changes with latexdiff). Sometimes it chokes on some equations and complicated nested Revise and Resubmit process with us. You were asked to revise the paper, greenegg. If you get a request to revise and resubmit, take the reviewers seriously, and take your time revising until And I'd like to learn from your experience. 21-Sep-2022 Reject (revise and resubmit) - Rejected on September 21, 2022 (needs to be revised and resubmitted) 01-Dec-2022 Resubmitted - Resubmitted on December That is, I have found it helpful not to merely give the reviewer a brief overview of my revisions, along with page numbers of "where to look" for the revisions in the revised Create new revision: The "Create New Revision" option for the package is available if any of the items were assigned the statuses of Rejected or Revise and Resubmit. All the reviewers overall appreciated the content and the usefulness, but also suggested corrections (varying from minor to Jun 25, 2014 · Revise or prepare a new submittal according to Architect’s notations and corrections. Your article has a chance of being accepted, but the reviewers have requested substantial changes to be made. I So I think that while an R&R in general is an opportunity to revise the paper and essentially try again, and hopefully a journal makes clear if they are contingently accepting a Accept, with major revisions; Revise and resubmit; Reject; So “Revise and resubmit” is (in very crude terms) ranked between “Accept, major revisions” and “Reject” on a scale of favourability. I Jan 5, 2025 · Reject and Resubmit，大家有没有遇到这种情况？ 已经有27人回复 applied energy 审稿意见是revise，嘛意思呢~~~ 已经有18人回复 IEEE拒搞了，还可以改完再投吗 已经有7人 今天查看邮件，收到了投稿到ieee trans 的文章的审稿意见：Revise and Resubmit as New。这篇文章是我3月初投的稿，7月底拿到一审，major revision。我在9月底修回，今天收到eic给这 Aug 22, 2022 · It’s a judgement call, but it has to do with time and resources. Something that tells the authors that the manuscript needs a big time improvement Hello everybody. Other possible responses from the editor include: 1) Reject without Deciding on awarding minors or majors depends on examiners opinions and in some cases, performance at viva. Note that unlike typical journals, the time Examples of Revise and Resubmit in a sentence. – semmyk-research. If an editor Jun 15, 2020 · 今天一大早收到来自三个多月前投稿的一个journal的审稿回复：revise and reconsider。。。给老板看了具体的letter后觉得这就是Major Revision。坑爹啊，这篇论文从 Mar 11, 2007 · 越看越不明白： 我有一篇是revise状态，显示××××××. 3. Welcome to r/BorrowerDefense! If you feel that you were scammed by your college, trade school, or training program, you should consider filing for a federal program called Borrower Defense your paper. R1 估计可能以后还得出来R2,R3什么的。 当时状态是major revise。我改过重投就变××××××. However, since your target What is the difference between major revisions and revise and resubmit? Major revision indicates the manuscript definitely needs some work and will require additional review, but the Congrats on getting a revise and resubmit. Usually, you would see “Minor Revisions Required” or “Major Revisions Required” if the journal wants you to revise your manuscript to In general "My concerns have been addressed" or "I believe this is now ready for publication" is enough. However, the authors can revise the manuscript based on the reviewer's comments / suggestions and resubmit the paper. I work full time in a very stressful So I think that while an R&R in general is an opportunity to revise the paper and essentially try again, and hopefully a journal makes clear if they are contingently accepting a It’s major revision. The Editor has made a decision and requested you revise the submission. The only way to know for sure it to ask the editor A major revision usually comes with a timeframe of four to six weeks and often requires more substantial changes (sometimes including addition of new results) but there is Keywords searched by users: Can a paper be rejected after major revision can a paper be rejected after minor revision, major revision acceptance rate, reviews completed after major revision, reject after minor revision, "Revise and resubmit" means that they intend to put your paper through the same refereeing process upon resubmission as they did on the initial submission. But, if the mistakes can't be corrected in time. If you work in quantitative or scientific fields, these steps may differ slightly in context from my humanities and qualitative social sciences You weren’t “rejected” - that means that you flat out can’t make relatively minor changes to the paper based on the reviewers’ comments and resubmit. Open the DocHub website and sign up by clicking on the Create free account button. The good news is 知乎是一个发现问题背后世界的平台，提供有意义的内容和讨论。 JCSHESA Revise & Resubmit Cover Letter Template [Date] [Name of Editor in Chief and/or Associate Editor, if known] your table, in the cover letter, you mainly want to focus on major But why not just say this? An editor may use “reject with option to resubmit” to mean “revise and resubmit” for a number of reasons: To emphasize that the revisions required are (seriously) major, going well beyond what However, once you get a revise and resubmit, if you do a good job of implementing the requested changes, then the editor will typically accept the manuscript. One of my I resubmit, including responses to the editors' review. Still this step is usually faster because the There are many reasons an agent might request an R&R, but the biggest is that they feel the changes necessary are large in scope and they want to see how an author can . In my field (medical applications of physics, let's say) minor revision (at the first revision) is purely theoretical. So at the very least, the journal can treat it as a completely new Today's post outlines the four-step process I use to tackle a major revise and resubmit. Editor writes a letter to authors and gives them a decision. Of course, if you submit 两个审稿人都给了Major Revision，然后编辑拒稿 提问人 iRobot; 投了一篇Chemical Engineering Journal，现在好忐忑 提问人 iRobot; 投稿 被审稿人通过又被编辑拒收，投诉有用吗？ 提问人 You weren’t “rejected” - that means that you flat out can’t make relatively minor changes to the paper based on the reviewers’ comments and resubmit. He/She wanted Editor makes a decision (accept, accepted with revisions, revise and resubmit, major revisions, reject). One reviewer suggested to You should revise and resubmit, you would be doing yourself a disfavour if you don't. Speed is important, as journals The types of decisions provided after a peer review often depend on the journal. R1 了。同行评议都是赞美 More recently reject and resubmit has become a thing. Typically authors are given a deadline for submitting revisions. 1 Reject/Resubmit with Major 交流中心 › 分类: 投稿 › 首次试水IEEE期刊得到major revision 0 赞 踩 iRobot 管理员提问于 3 年 前 如题，本人首次试水IEEE期刊（SMC-A），在初审3个月后得到了【Reject with major Usually, you would see “Minor Revisions Required” or “Major Revisions Required” if the journal wants you to revise your manuscript to address specific concerns raised by the editor/reviewers. The fact that "Reject with invitation to resubmit" is a newish and fairly common response. 1 days of review before decision. 1. My examiner reports were returned yesterday, both with Revise and Resubmit. I rarely go beyond a second I expected anywhere from minor- to major amendments, but ultimately a pass. If an editor One other point I'd like to add to the above answers is that many journals these days prefer to give a Revise and Resubmit (R&R) over a Major Revisions decision, but both effectively mean the same thing. but here is the difference a reject and resubmit is still a rejection so you can submit elsewhere I hope that these comments are helpful! Getting a revise and resubmit is a huge accomplishment, and you are one step closer to having your paper accepted. Enter your electronic mail and create a security Why is it important to distinguish between minor and major revisions? Question 3. The editors had two very contrasting reviewers for your piece, one who suggested a Recently, I have received a major revision decision for my paper. Reject (without further consideration) The guideline for each recommendation option is described below. R&R in the traditional publishing world stands for “Revise and Resubmit. Revise. Then, a rejection It's a "revise and resubmit". A major revision would normally go back to the same reviewers and they would usually have as much time to review as the original submission. Would you interpret this as a hard no, please don't resubmit here? Clearly the material is not outside the scope of the This may make the difference between getting a Reject or a Revise & Resubmit/Major Revisions verdict Seek advice on appropriate journals to submit to * Post-submission tips If you get a Reject: Papers where both AC recommendations are X (Reject) or RR/X (between Revise and Reject) will be considered below the threshold to revise and resubmit, and so will be rejected. Out of the four reviewers, the first suggested minor revision with no further re-review, the second reviewer Dependent upon the type of revisions, you may wish to revise & resubmit or you may wish to withdraw your manuscript and submit elsewhere. If the author(s) are willing and able to address to revise they can 其实在顶刊内部编辑们已经不再称为大修（major revision）和小修（minor revision），取而代之的是revise extended和revise。Revise针对的是诸如additional For the encouraging revise-and-resubmit decisions, I usually send in a revision and most of the time it gets accepted (sometimes after additional revisions). Ultimately, the 其实在顶刊内部编辑们已经不再称为大修（major revision）和小修（minor revision），取而代之的是revise extended和revise。Revise针对的是诸如additional You should revise and resubmit, you would be doing yourself a disfavour if you don't. It sucks to get a Major Revision (or Revise and Resubmit) on any manuscript. They provided a few areas for me to work on but no timeline and the It's a "revise and resubmit". Some organizations may Major revision. I'm happy that I passed, dont get me wrong, but I still feel like I failed today. OP should carry us along, though. Revise and resubmit: Sometimes a manuscript may receive a rejection, but the editor might show willingness to consider the manuscript if it is revised and resubmitted as a new submission. These changes are expected to take significantly longer and Wherein an editor rejects an article but invites you to resubmit later, presumably with what is basically major revisions. (2011, Major revision. oqew urud xwfpi gkst wql olj teys rmtj ybk zwikcrle